References

1. 1. Scargiali F., Busciglio A., Grisafi F., Brucato A. Oxygen transfer performance of unbaffled stirred vessels in view of their use as biochemical reactors for animal cell growth // Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012. V. 27. P. 205. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1227035
2. 2. Tsao G.T.N. Vortex behavior in the waldhof fermentor // Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1968. V. 10. № 2. P. 177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260100206
3. 3. Соколов В.Н., Яблокова М.А. Аппаратура микробиологической промышленности. Л.: Машиностроение, 1988.
4. 4. Rao A., Kumar B., Patel A. Vortex behavior in an unbaffled surface aerator // Sci. Asia. 2009. V. 35. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2009.35.183
5. 5. Scargiali F., Busciglio A., Grisafi F., Brucato A. Gas–liquid–solid operation of a high aspect ratio self-ingesting reactor // Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 2012. V. 10. № 1. Р. 839–845. https://doi.org/10.1515/1542-6580.3011
6. 6. Poncin S., Nguyen C., Midoux N., Breysse J. Hydrodynamics and volumetric gas–liquid mass transfer coefficient of a stirred vessel equipped with a gas-inducing impeller // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002. V. 57. № 16. P. 3299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509 (02)00200-2
7. 7. Saravanan K., Mundale V.D., Joshi J.B. Gas Inducing Type Mechanically Agitated Contactors // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994. V. 33. № 9. P. 2226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00033a029
8. 8. Newell R., Grano S. Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 2. Flotation scale-up for laboratory and pilot cells // Int. J. Min. Process. 2006. V. 81. № 2. P. 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2006.07.002
9. 9. Соколов В.Н., Доманский И.В. Газожидкостные реакторы. Л.: Машиностроение, 1976.
10. 10. Busciglio A., Caputo G., Scargiali F. Free-surface shape in unbaffled stirred vessels: Experimental study via digital image analysis // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013. V. 104. P. 868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.10.019
11. 11. Deshpande S.S., Kar K.K., Walker J., Pressler J., Su W. An experimental and computational investigation of vortex formation in an unbaffled stirred tank // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017. V. 168. P. 495. https://doi.org/.1016/j.ces.2017.04.002
12. 12. Ciofalo M., Brucato A., Grisafi F., Torraca N. Turbulent flow in closed and free-surface unbaffled tanks stirred by radial impellers // Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996. V. 51. № 14. P. 3557. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509 (96)00004-8
13. 13. Rielly C.D., Evans G.M., Davidson J.F., Carpenter K.J. Effect of vessel scaleup on the hydrodynamics of a self-aerating concave blade impeller // Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992. V. 47. № 13–14. P. 3395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509 (92)85050-L
14. 14. Hsu Y.C., Chen T.Y., Chen J.H., Lay C.W. Ozone Transfer into Water in a Gas-Inducing Reactor // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002. V. 41. № 1. P. 120. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0101341
15. 15. Conway K., Kyle A., Rielly C. Gas–liquid–solid operation of a vortex-ingesting stirred tank reactor // Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2002. V. 80. № 8. P. 839. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387602321143372
16. 16. Hsu Y.C., Huang C.J. Characteristics of a new gas-induced reactor // AIChE J. 1994. V. 42. № 11. P. 3146.
17. 17. Joshi J.B., Sharma M.M. Mass transfer and hydrodynamic characteristics of gas inducing type of agitated contactors // Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1977. V. 55. № 6. P. 683. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450550609
18. 18. Forrester S.E., Rielly C.D. Modelling the increased gas capacity of self-inducing impellers // Chem. Eng. Sci. 1994. V. 49. № 24. P. 5709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509 (94)00322-X
19. 19. Heim A., Krasawski A., Rzyski E., Stelmach J. Aeration of bioreactors by self-aspirating impellers // The Chem. Eng. J. Biochem. Eng. J. 1995. V. 58. № 1. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467 (94)06093-2
20. 20. Хультхольм С-Э., Юсела М., Лилья Л., Нюман Б. Перемешивающий аппарат и способ перемешивания газа в закрытом реакторе. Пат. ЕА003815В1. 2003.
21. 21. Войнов Н.А., Земцов Д.А., Фролов А.С. Способ насыщения жидкости газом в аппарате с мешалкой. Пат. 2790167 РФ. 2023
22. 22. Voinov N.A., Frolov A.S., Bogatkova A.V., Zemtsov D.A., Zhukova O.P. Method for Intensive Gas–Liquid Dispersion in a StirredTank // Chem. Eng. 2023. V. 7. № 2. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering7020030
23. 23. Хабибрахманов Р.Б., Мухачев С.Г. Особенности мощностных и массообменных характеристик биореактора с дисковыми перфорированными мешалками // Изв. вузов. Прикл. химия и биотехнол. 2019. Т. 9. № 4. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2019-9-4-737-749 [Khabibrakhmanov R.B., Mu- khachev S.G. Features of the powerful and mass exchange characteristics of a bioreactor with disk perforated mixers // Izv. universities. Graff. Chemistry and biotechnology. 2019. T. 9. № 4. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2019-9-4-737-749]
24. 24. Scargiali F., Busciglio A., Grisafi F., Brucato A. Simplified dynamic pressure method for measurement in aerated bioreactors // Biochem. Eng. J. 2010. V. 49. № 2. P. 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2009.12.008
25. 25. Scargiali F., Russo R., Grisafi F., Brucato A. Mass transfer and hydrodynamic characteristics of a high aspect ratio self-ingesting reactor for gas–liquid operations // Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007. V. 62. № 5. P. 1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.11.040
26. 26. Рамм В.М. Абсорбция газов. М.: Химия, 1976.
27. 27. Вознесенский А.С. Компьютерные методы в научных исследованиях. Часть 2. М.: МГГУ, 2010.
28. 28. El-Behery S.M., Hamed M.H. A comparative study of turbulence models performance for separating flow in a planar asymmetric diffuser // Comput. Fluids. 2011. V. 44. № 1. P. 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.009